References
Butler, J.A. (1992). Use of teaching methods within the lecture format. Medical Teacher, 14, 11-25.
Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47 (1), 1-32. Retrieved from http://www.nsse.iub.edu/pdf/research_papers/testing_linkages.pdf.
Chapman, E. (2003). Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(13). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=13.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39 (7), 3-7.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural determinants. Management Science, 32 (5), 554-571.
Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groups. Human Computer Interaction, 6, 199-146.
Ferenstein, G. (Jan 10, 2010). 3 Ways Educators Are Embracing Social Technology. Mashable. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2010/01/10/educators-social-technology/.
Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., & Steinfield, C. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J.
Fulk & C. Steinfield (Ed.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-140). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552.
Fulk, J., & Steinfield, C. W. (Ed.). (1990). Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Ice, P. (November 8th, 2007). Community of inquiry framework: Validation and instrument development. Presented at the Sloan-C Annual Conference in Orlando, FL.
Kaleta, R., & Joosten, T. (2007). Clickers in the classroom. ECAR Bulletin. EDUCAUSE.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 330-347.
Kiesler, S., Zubrow, D., Moses, A. M., & Geller, V. (1985). Affect in computer-mediated communications: an experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human Computer Interaction, 1, 77-104.
Kuh, G. D. (2001). Assessing what really matters to student learning: Inside the National Survey of Student Engagement. Change, 33 (3), 10-17.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE. Change, 35 (2), 24-32.
Kuh, G. D., Hayek, J. C., Carini, R. M., Ouimet, J. A., Gonyea, R. M., & Kennedy, J. (2001). NSSE technical and norms report, Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Bloomington
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and Technology: Youth are Leading the Transition to a Fully Wired and Mobile Nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/Teens-and-Technology.aspx?r=1.
McMahon, P. (November 8th, 2007). Learning from video games: Designing digital curriculums. Presented at the Sloan-C Annual Conference in Orlando, FL.
Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organization media. Human Communication Research, 9, 451-484
Saunders, K., & Love, T. (2004). A longitudinal study of Iowa State University 2000-2003 National Survey of Student Engagement data and learning community participation. Research Institute for Studies in Education. Retrieved October 16th, 2007, from http://www.lc.iastate.edu/
Saville B.K, Zinn T.E, Elliott M.P. (2005). Interteaching vs. traditional methods of instruction: A preliminary analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 161–163.
Saville, B.K., Zinn, T.E., Neef, N.A., Van Norman, R., and Ferreri, S.J. (2006). A Comparison of Interteaching and Lecture in the College Classroom. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 39(1): 49–61.
Shapiro, N. S., & Levine, J. (Eds.). (1999). Creating learning communities: A practical guide to winning support, organizing for change, and implementing programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Tinto, V. & Russo, P. (1994). Coordinated studies programs: Their effect on student involvement at a community college. Community college review, 22(2), 16-25.
Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyper-personal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
Walther, J.B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538-57
Walther, J. B., & Anderson, J. F. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Communication Research, 21, 460-488.
Wang, M.C., Dziuban, C.D., Cook, I.J., Moskal, P.D. (2009). [Dr. Fox Rocks: Using Data-mining Techniques to Examine Student Ratings of Instruction]. In M. C. Shelley II, L. D. Yore, & B. Hand (Eds.), Quality research in literacy and science education: International perspectives and gold standards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Springer, pp383-398.
Zhao, C. & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115-138
